🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," stated the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization established by the family of a young person who died after viewing disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and others show that policymakers internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.